Talk:Neale Junction

Australia: Western Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Neale Junction is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Australian Roads: Western Australia Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Australian Roads, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads and highways in Australian states and territories. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Australian RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Australian RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Australian RoadsAustralia road transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics:
/
	Western Australia

This article may or may not contain a map. Please check, then add "needs-map=" to this template accordingly.

Date of visitors book

"Completed visitors book ACC - 5853A/1 17 April 1901 to 1 July 2002 was retrieved from the visitors box at the Junction by Ian Murray of Explorer Tours in 2002."

Referring to note 5 (above) of the main article, the start date for the visitors book of 17 April 1901 is an obvious typo, as the Anne Beadell Highway and Neale Junction were not completed until 1962.Summerdrought (talk) 23:21, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

I know that there is some hard feelings because of the current template for discussion clusterfrick. However, that in itself is not a reasoning for reverting. The infoboes on this article are for the highways that meet at this junction, not for the junction itself. This was neither summarizing the information in the article nor representing it accurately. If you're reverting because you feel this is a behind the back attack, then convert it to a CORRECT infobox for the junction, not for the thousand+ kilometre highways that meet at the junction. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 17:43, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]